Could we put the "framework" in nonlinked italics to give a more comprehensive list?--Ember Nickel 13:35, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Sure. The whole point of this site is comprehensiveness =) --LordTBT ^Talk! 23:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok, just gave it a shot. The # signs didn't work with my comments, so I went back to *s.

Notes on the "approximatelys":

• I'm figuring Martin's dead before the prologue and epilogue of Mossflower.
• Saxtus could have been describing Mariel and Dandin's second departure (with the Pearl Queen), but that seems less likely what I went with.
• I don't remember hearing about Russano's wife and kids in or before Taggerung, so I put them afterwards.
• No idea when Rillbrook comes in.

--Ember Nickel 18:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah it's impossible to tell with Rillbrook. Actually the bullet points work out better for this, so people can distinguish between the actual novels and the in-between =) --LordTBT ^Talk! 18:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

If Bellmaker is after Martin the Warrior's frame, why isn't Mellus there? And why did Saxtus call Dandin and Mariel, en I quote, "Young ones"? Shieldmaiden ^Talk! 13:07, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

That should be rephrased; the "Only pay attention to the bullet pints' bit, that it. All of the things are in bullets, so that's like saying, 'Don't pay attention to anything that's not on here, which wouldn't be on here anyways.' I get that the indented stuff is for people who are crazy about reading things in Chronological order, but perhaps they should be Italicized and it should say that the Italics is for the persnickety Chronologicalist.

By the way, if you were to just read the books in order, not skipping about prologues and epilogues and book two and book one, but the whole book, which would come first, "Martin the Warrior" and "Mossflower" or "Legend of Luke"? If I decide to reread the series, I always go Brocktree-Legend of Luke-Martin the Warrior, etc, because the bulk of the plot has to do with Luke, not Martin. Just a thought.

-- LPG ^{Will draw for Mac and Cheese!} 04:03, May 15, 2010 (UTC)

Luke is half/half. And considering much of it involves familiarity with Martin/Gonff, the order as listed is correct. -- LordTBT ^Talk! 20:15, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Question Edit

Why is it that Wikipedia and Redwall Wiki both have a different chronological order than Brian Jacques official website? For example Lord Brocktree is stated as book #1 on both "wiki" sites but Brian says it is book #13????? I need a clarification as to why there is conflicting orders? Please and thank you. —This unsigned comment was added by 184.17.14.102 (talk • contribs) 12:08, June 19, 2011. Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

You're confusing Chronological Order with Publication Order - LB is 13 in terms of publication order. -- LordTBT ^Talk! 13:58, June 19, 2011 (UTC)